Performance benchmarking

Breast Cancer

12 Februar 2020

Authors

Michiro Sasaki et al

Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: experience of use of the ScreenPoint Medical Transpara system in 310 Japanese women

Michiro Sasaki, Mitsuhiro Tozaki, Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz, Daisuke Yotsumoto, Yumi Ichiki, Aiko Terawaki, Shunichi Oosako, Yasuaki Sagara, Yoshiaki Sagara

Background

To compare the breast cancer detection performance in digital mammograms of a panel of three unaided human readers (HR) versus a stand-alone artificial intelligence (AI)-based Transpara system in a population of Japanese women.

Methods:

The subjects were 310 Japanese female outpatients who underwent digital mammographic examinations between January 2018 and October 2018. A panel of three HR provided a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) score, and Transpara system provided an interactive decision support score and an examination-based cancer likelihood score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were compared under each of reading conditions.

Results:

The AUC was higher for human readers than with stand-alone Transpara system (human readers 0.816; Transpara system 0.706; difference 0.11; P < 0.001). The sensitivity of the unaided HR for diagnosis was 89% and specificity was 86%. The sensitivity of stand-alone Transpara system for cutoff scores of 4 and 7 were 93% and 85%, and specificities were 45% and 67%, respectively.

Key Finding:

Transpara showed a high performance in a study population of women with dense breasts


You might also like