Breast AI Research Portfolio
Rooted in Research. Optimized for Outcomes.
Redefining what breast cancer detection can be.
Recent research highlights
AITIC: "Autonomous AI" for low risk cases
Researchers used Transpara Detection to safely reduce radiologist workload by over 60% by excluding low risk studies (including DM and DBT) from human review.
MASAI: Interval cancer reduction
The first RCT in the field finds that Transpara increased cancer detection, improved radiologist workflow, and decreased the rate of interval cancers by 12%.
From screening to stereotactic biopsy
"Given its high sensitivity and high negative predictive value, AI may be used to guide radiologists in making biopsy or follow up recommendations."
Comparable performance to double reading
"AI detection of breast cancer in population-based mammography screening is comparable with double human reading."
Not all research is created equal
Born from the collaboration of two leading researchers in image processing, ScreenPoint’s origins in applied academia required us to be relentlessly focused on pushing frontiers in AI in breast imaging. Clinical research collaborations have been integral to our growth and our credibility.
Workflow
Transpara saves practicing radiologists time - without compromising on clinical quality.
Confidence
Transpara’s unmarked studies have a 99.97% negative predictive value.Results
Human sensitivity for breast cancer on mammograms can drop from around 80% in the least dense breast tissue to between 50-60% in the densest breasts.With Transpara
Enhanced workflow
Whether you are reading DBT studies in a single reader screening environment like the United States, or identifying lower-risk studies for reducing reading burden in a double reading screening environment, Transpara saves practicing radiologists time – without compromising on clinical quality.
Greater confidence
Reading faster has no value without confidence in the results. Transpara’s unmarked studies (70% of a typical screening population) have a 99.97% negative predictive value. These results save ~26% of reading time on DBT studies (Van Winkel, et al, 2021) or up to 44% of workload in a FFDM double-reading environment (Hernström, et al, 2025) while improving the cancer detection rate. Time saved can also save lives.
Consistent results
One of the barriers to confident mammography reading is breast density. Human sensitivity for breast cancer on mammograms can drop from around 80% in the least dense breast tissue to between 50-60% in the densest breasts. Transpara analysis is not affected by the visual characteristics of density in the same way.
Research Portfolio
For more information and the latest news, head to our Insights Page →
.webp?width=217&height=60&name=Screenpoint-Med%20(1).webp)